Editorial Policy
How PeptideWiki selects sources, verifies facts and corrects mistakes: the rules our editorial process follows.
PeptideWiki is a peptide reference read by people with real health questions, so our rules for handling facts are public: how we write, what we rely on, and what we do when we get something wrong.
Content is produced by the PeptideWiki editorial team using AI tools: they help gather and structure the literature, but nothing is published by them alone. A human editor reviews every piece before it goes live; Dmitry Veprentsev is responsible for the site's content.
We build on primary sources: peer-reviewed publications (PubMed, DOI), regulator documents (FDA, EMA) and anti-doping lists (WADA). Links point to specific papers, not homepages; regulatory sections carry the date they were last verified, so every claim can be checked against its moment in time.
We describe what studies showed ("the study used a dose of…") and never give instructions ("take…"). Risks and contraindications come before dosage data. This site does not replace a physician and offers no medical advice.
Profiles and articles are revised as new publications and regulatory events appear; pages carry their update dates. We don't refresh dates for their own sake: a date changes only together with the content.
Spotted an inaccuracy? Write to us via the Contact page. Confirmed mistakes get fixed, and we don't hide the fact of the correction: the reference being right matters more than it looking flawless.
PeptideWiki sells nothing: no peptides, no consultations, no vendor ads. There are no affiliate links. The project takes no funding from manufacturers or stores — a deliberate constraint that lets us cover substances without a conflict of interest.
Who is responsible
PeptideWiki is an independent project run by Dmitry Veprentsev. Questions, corrections and suggestions — via the Contact page.
Contact